A case of Warthin-like papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse sclerosing stroma and a novel RET mutation: a new entity or a combined tumour?

Fausto Maffini^1,*, Daniele Lorenzini^2,*, Daniela Lepanto¹, Elvio De Fiori³, Caterina Fumagalli¹, Alessandra Rappa¹, Marta Tagliabue⁴ and Massimo Barberis¹

¹Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy

²University of Milan School of Medicine, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy

³Department of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy

⁴Division of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy

^*These authors contributed equally to writing this article.

Abstract

Activating mutations of the RET gene have been described for both papillary (chromosomal rearrangement) and medullary (missense mutations) thyroid carcinomas. Here, we describe a case of a Warthin-like variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma displaying some morphological aspects that mimic the diffuse sclerosing variant. The tumour harboured BRAF V600E mutation and a novel germline point mutation in the RET gene, with unknown clinical and pathological meaning.

Keywords: RET, BRAF, thyroid carcinoma, mutation, pathology

Correspondence to: Fausto Maffini
Email: fausto.maffini@ieo.it

Published: 02/10/2019
Received: 09/05/2019

Publication costs for this article were supported by ecancer (UK Charity number 1176307).

Copyright: © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common type of thyroid malignant tumours, accounting for up to 80% of overall cases [1]. Although most of them belong to the so-called classic phenotype, several variants have been described and currently classified according to the WHO classification [2]. In particular, a group of these variants features oncocytic changes in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells and includes the Warthin-like variant (WL-PTC), first described by Apel et al [3]. This variant derives its name from the close morphological resemblance to the homonym major salivary glands tumour. It exhibits an architectural pattern constituted of papillary fibrovascular stalks lined by columnar-cuboidal oncocytic neoplastic cells, with nuclear features typical of PTC (i.e., nuclear enlargement, chromatin clearing, inclusions and grooves), and a prominent lymphocytic infiltrate surrounding them. This particular tumour is almost always associated with chronic autoimmune thyroiditis in the non-neoplastic gland [4]. According to current knowledge, this variant does not bear any worse prognostic meaning when compared with classic type with concurrent autoimmune thyroiditis, in contrast with the ‘pure’ oncocytic variant of PTC. It has been hypothesised that its excellent prognosis could be related to Hashimoto thyroiditis [5].

In the past decade, activating mutations of BRAF (a proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase), in particular, those involving V600E exchange, have been detected in a high percentage of PTC and the clinical relevance of this finding is still under debate. In fact, the presence of BRAF mutation is a marker of an aggressive neoplasm, but it is not related to any increase in mortality and recurrence rates [6].

The second most common molecular alteration found in PTC is one of thirteen different chromosomal translocations involving the RET proto-oncogene, yielding various fusion proteins referred to as RET/PTC, demonstrated by Grieco et al in 1990 [7]. These rearrangements imply constitutional dimerisation and consequent activation of RET tyrosine-kinase domain, followed by an increase in cell proliferation [8]. A recent study showed that the prevalence of BRAF mutation was higher in WL-PTC (26/40) than in the conventional variant, in accordance with the results of previous studies conducted in smaller case series [5, 9, 10]. However, this difference disappears when data are normalised for autoimmune thyroiditis [5].

On the other hand, only two studies investigated the state of RET oncogene in four cases of WL-PTC, using immunohistochemistry, with three tumours harbouring one of the previously described translocations [11, 12].

Case report

In May 2017, a 34-year-old female presented with a nodule in the right thyroid lobe. The nodule was diagnosed as malignant upon cytological examination performed in another centre and classified Tir-5, according to the Italian Thyroid Classification (Category 6-Malignant according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology) [13, 14].

The patient was affected by longstanding autoimmune thyroiditis treated with oral levothyroxine 100 μg/day.

The ultrasound (US) examination of the thyroid, performed in our institution, showed parenchymal disarray with a hypo-echoic nodule in the upper third of the right lobe, with a long-axis diameter of 1.3 cm, without peripheral halo nor increased vascular pattern in its inner area (Figure 1).

Figure 1. US image showing a hypo-echoic nodule in the right lobe, with a long-axis diameter of 1.3 cm, without peripheral halo and with vascular pattern in the inner area.

Since the clinical staging was cT1b cN0 (TNM 7th ed) [15], the patient underwent complete thyroidectomy (justified by her chronic autoimmune thyroiditis already in hormone-replacement therapy) and central neck lymph node dissection; all the four areas were resected (ABCD) following the institutional guidelines [16].

Surgical specimens were fixed in buffered formalin for 24 hours, and at gross examination, we identified an ill-defined hard fibrous area, with a haemorrhagic focus, in the upper third of the right lobe.

Consequently, selected specimens of thyroid parenchyma were paraffin-embedded, cut in 5-μm slides and stained with standard Haematoxylin and Eosin stain (see Appendix: Supplementary Figures).

The fibrous ill-defined area corresponded to the carcinoma, with two different histological patterns: one constituted by a dense fibrous area with slender neoplastic cells, with PTC cytological features and foci of squamous metaplasia, intermingled with lymphoid cells; the second composed by broad papillary fronds encircled by columnar-cuboidal cells with a dense lymphoid infiltrate, with scattered germinal centres. Also, neoplastic cells in this area showed the cytological features of PTC. While the last area resembled a WTL-PTC (Warthin Like-Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma) (Figure 2A), the first component was similar to the diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC (Figure 2B). All identified lymph nodes were negative for metastatic tumour.

Given the different prognostic meaning of the Warthin-like and the diffuse sclerosing variants, we performed an immunohistochemical evaluation of cytokeratin 19, Galectin-3 and p40 expression according to manufacturer’s instructions (all markers were purchased from Dako, Dakopatts, Denmark).

We detected an intense immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 19 and Galectin-3 (Figure 3) in every neoplastic cell and a focal positivity for p40 in few neoplastic cells in sclerosing areas (Figure 4). Moreover, we investigated BRAF and RET mutational status of the neoplastic population by next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, applying the Oncomine Focus Assay (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Figure 2. (A) Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant x200 magnification. (B) Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant upper left merged with Warthin-like areas; in the upper right psammomatous, microcalcifications are clearly evident x200 magnification.

Figure 3. Intense cytoplasmatic Galectine-3 immunostaining in both Warthin-like and sclerosing areas.

Figure 4. Nuclear p40 immunostaining consistent with squamous differentiation in few neoplastic cells in sclerosing areas.

The most representative areas of both neoplastic components (about 1:1 ratio) were selected and were manually macrodissected before nucleic acid isolation (tumoural cell content after enrichment equal to 20%). Genomic DNA and RNA were extracted using the Qiagen AllPrep FFPE (Formalin Fixed and Paraffin Embedded) DNA/RNA Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and then quantified with the Qubit high-sensitivity DNA/RNA assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Libraries were constructed starting from 10 ng of DNA/RNA and templates were prepared using the Ion Chef Machine (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Sequencing of templates was performed on an Ion Torrent S5 Sequencer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) and the data were analysed using the Ion Reporter variant caller software v.5.6. The NGS analysis revealed a point mutation in exon 15 of BRAF (p.Val600Glu, p.V600E) with an allele frequency of 5% (coverage 1,995 reads) and a point mutation in exon 11 of RET (p.Ile638Val, p.I638V) (coverage 2,000 reads) with an allele frequency of 47%, never described before to the best of our knowledge. We additionally tested the corresponding normal thyroid tissue and found the same RET variant, (Variant allele frequency = 48%), confirming the germinal origin of the variant. Both variants were confirmed by real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing, respectively, according to Mu et al [17]. No RET-fusion genes were identified by NGS (Figure 5). The patient was discharged after 4 days without any complications, in treatment with hormone replacement suppressive therapy (0.1 < TSH (Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone) > 0.5); she was free of disease at last follow-up.

Figure 5. (A): IGV (Integrative Genomics Viewer) graphic showing a single nucleotide variant (SNV) in the RET gene (A > G), producing p.Ile638Val alteration. Forward and reverse strands are displayed in different colours. The reference sequence is reported below (NM_020975.4). (B): Electropherogram obtained by Sanger sequencing confirming the p.Ile638Val mutation.

Discussion

This case was challenging due to the differential diagnosis between the Warthin-like and the diffuse sclerosing variants of PTC.

The prognosis of these two variants is different: the former has a good prognosis, comparable to the classic type of PTC, while the latter is characterised by a higher incidence of cervical nodes involvement, reported as around 80%, and distant metastases, present in 10%–15% of cases [18]. These findings correlate with an increased risk of neoplastic relapse and mortality in patients with diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC, as compared with classic variant, although very few studies have so far recorded overall survival in diffuse sclerosing variant [19].

In the present case, we observed a thick fibrous stroma encircling neoplastic cells, associated with psammoma bodies, squamous metaplasia (with p40 positive neoplastic cells) and a dense lymphocytic infiltrate; the histological and immunohistochemical evaluation alone was insufficient to achieve the correct diagnosis.

The analysis of BRAF mutation and RET rearrangement has been useful to discern between these two variants. In fact, BRAF activating mutations have been reported in the literature in a high percentage of WL-PTC [5]; the existence of various substitutions involving V600 codon of the BRAF protein underscores the importance of a complete evaluation of the mutational status of this gene [12]. Moreover, we found a 5% allele frequency of BRAF mutation; such a low value may be explained because of other non-neoplastic cells commixed with neoplastic ones (i.e., lymphocytes, stromal cells), highlighting the clinical relevance of using a high-sensitivity technique, such as next-generation sequencing (tumoural cell content of specimens tested: 20%). Recently, some authors identified a genetic alteration of the MAPK (Mitogen-Activating Protein Kinase) pathway in about 70% of PTC using NGS, detecting either point mutations or structural rearrangements [20]. This technique allowed the recognition of other novel molecular alteration in PTC, as in our case [21].

This finding helped us in the differential diagnosis, BRAF mutation has rarely been reported in diffuse sclerosing variant and this variant is frequently characterised by RET-PTC rearrangement, which we did not find in our case [22, 23]. It has been hypothesised that the aggressive behaviour of diffuse sclerosing variant is linked to its molecular peculiarity.

Globally, morphology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular results, involving BRAF and RET genes, led us to the correct diagnosis.

As unexpected result following NGS, we observed a new mutation involving exon 11 p.Ile638Val (c.1912A > G) of RET that had not been reported before to the best of our knowledge. This mutation was observed also in non-neoplastic thyroid tissue, representing a germline alteration.

In medullary carcinomas, RET is often activated by missense mutation (95% of familiar cases and 40% of sporadic ones), while in PTC, the activation is due to chromosomal rearrangements [24]. The hotspot regions involved are exon 11 (codon 634) and exon 16 (codon 918), frequently mutated in multiple endocrine neoplasm (MEN) syndromes and in sporadic medullary carcinomas [25]. However, isolated mutations have been identified in other codons, such as codons 639, 641 and 922, reported by Kalinin and co-workers [26]. Due to the rare occurrence of PTC in patients affected by MEN2, it has been suggested that activating RET point mutations could play a role in the pathogenesis of this neoplasia [27]. Missense mutations have never been described in sporadic cases at the best of our knowledge.

The mutation we observed has not been previously reported and the clinicopathological significance of this finding is still unknown. We can speculate that this RET variant could be potentially pathogenic because the amino acid change involves the transmembrane domain of the protein, encoded by codons 636–657. Indeed, other mutations involving this domain have been previously associated with an alteration in hydrophobicity causing a conformational change and an increase in RET kinase activity [28]. Moreover, the in-silico tool ‘PolyPhen2’ predicts that the p.Ile638Val variant is potentially deleterious for RET protein functionality [29]. We speculate that the presence of this double genetic alteration could be responsible for the peculiar histopathological features of the neoplasm; we cannot exclude that patient’s neoplastic risk is increased due to that germline mutation since it has not been described before.

Further studies in larger case series are warranted in order to identify the clinical and pathological implications of this novel mutation. In parallel, the molecular changes caused by this amino acidic substitution remain to be further characterised and could account for possible pathogenic effects, for instance, by constitutional dimerisation or activation of the kinase domain.

Conclusion

This is a rare case characterised by double morphological features, Warthin-like and diffuse sclerosing-like, with a different prognosis and with a new mutation never described before to the best of our knowledge. We speculated if it were a collision tumour or only a neoplasm with double differentiation and uncertain prognosis.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to our laboratory technicians, Mrs M Schiavi, T Tamagni, Mr P Lopedote, F Spinelli and G De Marzo, for their work and devoted time.

Funding

None of the authors and technicians received funds or funding for the realization of the article.

References

1. Rosai J, DeLellis RA, and Carcangiu ML, et al (2014) Tumors of the Thyroid and Parathyroid Gland—AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology 4th Series Ed. Steven G Silverberg (Silver Spring, MD: American Registry of Pathology) ISBN 1-933-477-32-6

2. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, and Klopper G, et al (2015) WHO Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs: Papillary Carcinoma: Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma 4th edn (IARC Press) pp 81–91

3. Apel RL, Asa SL, and LiVolsi VA (1995) Papillary Hürthle cell carcinoma with lymphocytic stroma. “Warthin-like tumor” of the thyroid Am J Surg Pathol 19 810–814 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199507000-00009 PMID: 7793479

4. Baloch ZW and LiVolsi VA (2000) Warthin-like papillary carcinoma of the thyroid Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 1192–1195 PMID: 10923082

5. Yeo MK, Bae JS, and Lee S, et al (2015) The warthin-like variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a comparison with classic type in the patients with coexisting hashimoto’s thyroiditis Int J Endocrinol 2015 456027 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/456027 PMID: 25983754 PMCID: 4423001

6. Gandolfi G, Sancisi V, and Piana S, et al (2015) Time to re-consider the meaning of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma Int J Cancer 137 1001–1011 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28976

7. Grieco M, Santoro M, and Berlingieri MT, et al (1990) PTC is a novel rearranged form of the ret proto-oncogene and is frequently detected in vivo in human thyroid papillary carcinomas Cell 60 557–563 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90659-3 PMID: 2406025

8. Prescott JD and Zeiger MA (2015) The RET oncogene in papillary thyroid carcinoma Cancer 121 2137–2146 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29044 PMID: 25731779

9. Trovisco V, Vieira de Castro I, and Soares P, et al (2004) BRAF mutations are associated with some histological types of papillary thyroid carcinoma J Pathol 202 247–251 https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1511 PMID: 14743508

10. Finkelstein A, Levy GH, and Hui P, et al (2012) Papillary thyroid carcinomas with and without BRAF V600E mutations are morphologically distinct Histopathology 60 1052–1059 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04149.x PMID: 22335197

11. D’Antonio A, De Chiara A, and Santoro M, et al (2000) Warthin-like tumour of the thyroid gland: RET/PTC expression indicates it is a variant of papillary carcinoma Histopathology 36 493–498 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2000.00925.x PMID: 10849090

12. Han F, Zhang L, and Zhang S, et al (2015) Occult oncocytic papillary thyroid carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (Warthin-like tumor): report of a case with concomitant mutations of BRAF V600E and V600K Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8 5896–5901 PMID: 26191315 PMCID: 4503186

13. Nardi F, Basolo F, and Crescenzi A, et al (2014) Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology J Endocrinol Invest 37 593–599 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-014-0062-0 PMID: 24789536

14. Cibas ES, Ali SZ, and NCI Thyroid FNA State of the Science Conference (2009) The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology Am J Clin Pathol 132 658–665 https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA PMID: 19846805

15. Sobin L, Gospodarowicz M, and Wittekind C (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 7th edn UICC pp 58–62

16. Giugliano G, Proh M, and Gibelli B, et al (2014) Central neck dissection in differentiated thyroid cancer: technical notes Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 34(1) 9–14 PMID: 24711677 PMCID: 3970229

17. Mu W, Lu HM, and Chen J, et al (2016) Sanger confirmation is required to achieve optimal sensitivity and specificity in next-generation sequencing panel testing J Mol Diagn 18(6) 923–932 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.07.006 PMID: 27720647

18. Pillai S, Gopalan V, and Smith RA, et al (2015) Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma--an update of its clinicopathological features and molecular biology Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 94 64–73 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.12.001 PMID: 25577570

19. Vuong HG, Kondo T, and Pham TQ, et al (2017) Prognostic significance of diffuse sclerosing variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Endocrinol 176 431–439 https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0863

20. Lu Z, Zhang Y, and Feng D, et al (2017) Targeted next generation sequencing identifies somatic mutations and gene fusions in papillary thyroid carcinoma Oncotarget 8 45784–45792 PMID: 28507274 PMCID: 5542227

21. Cha YJ and Koo JS (2016) Next-generation sequencing in thyroid cancer J Transl Med 14 322 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-1074-7 PMID: 27871285 PMCID: 5117557

22. Sheu SY, Schwertheim S, and Worm K, et al (2007) Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: lack of BRAF mutation but occurrence of RET/PTC rearrangements Mod Pathol 20 779–787 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800797 PMID: 17464312

23. Joung JY, Kim TH, and Jeong DJ, et al (2016) Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: major genetic alterations and prognostic implications Histopathology 69 45–53 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12902

24. Yamamoto H, Ishii J, and Chiba T, et al (2017) Sporadic minute medullary thyroid carcinoma with a double RET mutation: a case report Pathol Int https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12588 PMID: 28952196

25. Nikiforov YE (2008) Thyroid carcinoma: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets Mod Pathol 21 S37–S43 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2008.10 PMID: 18437172 PMCID: 2673022

26. Kalinin VN, Amosenko FA, and Shabanov MA, et al (2001) Three novel mutations in the RET proto-oncogene J Mol Med (Berl) 79 609–612 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001090100250

27. Melillo RM, Cirafici AM, and De Falco V, et al (2004) The oncogenic activity of RET point mutants for follicular thyroid cells may account for the occurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients affected by familial medullary thyroid carcinoma Am J Pathol 165 511–521 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63316-0 PMID: 15277225 PMCID: 1618571

28. Tessitore A, Sinisi AA, and Pasquali D, et al (1999) A novel case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A associated with two de novo mutations of the RET protooncogene J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84 3522–3527 PMID: 10522989

29. Flanagan SE, Patch AM, and Ellard S (2010) Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 14 533–537 https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2010.0036 PMID: 20642364

Appendix: Supplementary Figures

Figure S1. Landscape of papillary carcinoma with two components: bottom left the Warthin-like and upper middle-right the sclerosing ones.

Figure S2. The sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma with inflammation, sclerosis.

Figure S3. Papillary carcinoma another Warthin-like features.

Figure S4. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant.

Figure S5. Papillary carcinoma Warthin-like merging with sclerosing ones.

Figure S6. Papillary carcinoma with only sclerosing areas.

Figure S7. Papillary carcinoma with sclerosing X10 magnification.

Figure S8. Papillary carcinoma Warthin-like x100 magnification.

Figure S9. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant with inflammation and desmoplasia. X400 magnification.

Figure S10. Papillary carcinoma Warthin-like with classical features of Warthin tumor; papillary growth, lymphocytes rich stroma and thyrocytes with papillary nuclear features. X400 magnification.

Figure S11. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant x200 magnification.

Figure S12. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant x400 magnification.

Figure S13. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant x400 magnification.

Figure S14. Papillary carcinoma sclerosing variant with the squamous metaplasia area clearly evident by p40 staining and indicated by arrows. x400 magnification.