ecancermedicalscience

Clinical Study

PET/CT with Fluorodeoxyglucose during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

29 Mar 2016
Laura L Travaini, Maria G Zampino, Marzia Colandrea, Mahila E Ferrari, Laura Gilardi, Maria C Leonardi, Luigi Santoro, Roberto Orecchia, Chiara M Grana

Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) with Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) to predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Patients and methods: Forty-one LARC patients performed [18F]FDG-PET/CT at baseline (PET0). All patients received continuous capecitabine concomitant to radiotherapy on the pelvis, followed by intermittent capecitabine until two weeks before curative surgery. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was also carried out at 40 Gy-time (PET1) and at the end of neoadjuvant therapy (PET2). PET imaging was analysed semi-quantitatively through the measurement of maximal standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and the tumour volume (TV). Histology was expressed through pTNM and Dworak tumor regression grading. Patients were categorised into responder (downstaging or downsizing) and non-responder (stable or progressive disease by comparison pretreatment parameters with clinical/pathological characteristics posttreatment/after surgery). Logistic regression was used to evaluate SUVmax and TV absolute and percent reduction as predictors of response rate using gender, age, and CEA as covariates. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survivals were compared by the Log-Rank test.

Results: Twenty-three responders (9 ypCR, 14 with downstaged disease) and 18 non-responders showed differences in terms of both early and posttreatment SUVmax percent reduction (median comparison: responder = 63.2%, non-responder = 44.2%, p = 0.04 and responder = 76.9%, non-responder = 61.6%, p = 0.06 respectively). The best predictive cut-offs of treatment response for early and posttreatment SUVmax percent reduction were ≥57% and ≥66% from baseline (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01 respectively).

Conclusions: [18F]FDG-PET/CT is a reliable technique for evaluating therapy response during neoadjuvant treatment in LARC, through a categorical classification of the SUV max reduction during treatment.

Related Articles

Adewale Isaiah Oyewole, Funmilola Olanike Wuraola, Amir H Sohail, Titilope Ogunniyi, Chinyere Nwankwo, Zainab Oyindamola Adegbite, Dorcas Olaide Ebekue, Clement D Awe, Elizabeth N Christian, Kristina Diaz, Oluwasegun Afolaranmi, Clara N Lambert, Dan Sherman, George Gutierrez, Chinenye Iwuji, Juliet S Lumati
Ally H Mwanga, Jeanine Justiniano, Eric M Mbuguje, Balowa Musa, Deogratius B Mwanakulya, Andrew Swallow, Edith Kimambo, Eva Uiso, Swaleh Pazi, Latifa Rajab, Nashivai E Kivuyo, Larry Akoko, Azza Naif, Advera Ngaiza, Sara Nyagabona, Jerry Ndumbalo, Amos R Mwakigonja, Jim E Littlejohn, Seif Wibonela, Cameron E Gaskill
Rodrigo Lastra, Patricia Iranzo, Javier-David Benítez-Fuentes, Ana Callejo, Mara Cruellas, Jacobo Gómez Ulla, Isabel Pimentel, José Luis Pérez-Gracia, Marta Ramos, Francisco Gil Moncayo, María Álvarez Alejandro, Marta Gascón, Sergio Martínez Recio, Pilar Rivero, Jorge Bartolomé, Antonio David Lázaro Sánchez, David Fernández Garay, Alicia de Luna Aguilar, Isabel Lorenzo Lorenzo, Joan Brunet, Noemi Reguart, Dario Trapani
Juzzel Ian Zerrudo, Patrick Vincent Aquino, Christian Joseph Tagal, Ma Erica Valdeabella, Christian Norwiz Buenviaje