Pembrolizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel combo shows antitumour activity in first-line recurrent/metastatic HNSCC

Share :
Published: 14 Sep 2022
Views: 333
Rating:
Save
Dr Marcin Dzienis - Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia

Dr Marcin Dzienis speaks to ecancer about phase IV of the KEYNOTE-B10 study which explored pembrolizumab with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.  

The primary endpoint was overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). The secondary endpoints were duration or response and progression free survival by BICR, overall survival, safety and tolerability. 

The results of the study concluded that pembrolizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel combo showed antitumour activity with a manageable safety profile, suggesting this 5-FU-free regimen may be comparable to historica lfirst-line standard of care and may expand treatment options for first-line recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

This is a phase IV single-arm open-label study of pembrolizumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel used as the first-line treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. This study mostly looked at an alternative chemotherapy backbone to the current standard of care of platinum 5FU and pembrolizumab. 

As I said, it was an open-label, single-arm study. Patients who were eligible for the study had an untreated head and neck cancer from oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx. They all accessed the treatment – up to six cycles of chemotherapy and up to 20 cycles of pembrolizumab. We assessed response rate and tolerability. This is an early read-out of the study with survival data not available yet.

The response rate was quite high at 42% and tolerability was as expected for a triplet therapy with no new signals seen. Although the study is still ongoing and further data will be presented later, it appears to be a 5FU-free treatment option for patients treated in the first-line head and neck cancer setting.

This study was obviously a smaller study than the overall KEYNOTE-048 study. However, it does increase the treatment options for patients who face this incurable disease with limited treatment options.

Why is head and neck squamous cell carcinoma a difficult disease to treat?

Responses to immunotherapy have been less than initially expected in this patient population. This is also quite a heavily comorbid patient population with quite significant treatment of surgery and chemoradiotherapy that proceed the relapse. So their performance status, nutrition level, are often lower than other patient groups. This altogether probably compounds the lower efficacy of treatments used so far.