Researchers suggest that for people with recurrent glioblastoma, administering an immunotherapy drug before surgery is more effective than using the drug afterwards.
In recent years, immunotherapy drugs, which harness the body's immune system to destroy cancer cells, have been shown to be helpful in treating people with advanced or metastatic cancer.
But the drugs have yet to show any benefit in helping people with glioblastoma - which is an aggressive and deadly form of brain cancer.
On average, most people with recurrent glioblastoma live for just six to nine months.
The study, published in Nature Medicine, was led by Robert Prins, a professor of molecular and medical pharmacology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and Dr Timothy Cloughesy, a professor of neuro-oncology at the Geffen School of Medicine.
It shows for the first time that pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor drug can be effective in treating people with recurrent glioblastoma.
In the study, people treated with the drug prior to surgery lived nearly twice as long after surgery as the average life expectancy for people with the disease.
Pembrolizumab is an antibody that works by blocking a checkpoint protein called PD-1, which stops T cells from attacking cancer cells.
Cancer cells often use PD-1 to keep T cells at bay.
But inhibiting the engagement of the protein with a checkpoint inhibitor drug like pembrolizumab enables the immune system to attack the cancer more effectively.
"The results are very encouraging," said Prins, the study's senior author. "This is the first hint that immunotherapy can have a clinical benefit for patients with malignant brain tumours and help prevent future recurrences."
The trial, which took place at seven medical centres throughout the U.S. evaluated 35 people with recurrent and surgically resectable glioblastoma - meaning the tumours could be removed by surgery.
Of them, 16 received pembrolizumab before their surgeries and 19 received the drug afterwards.
Those who received the drug before surgery survived an average of 417 days, those who received the drug after surgery lived an average of 228 days.
"By administering the immunotherapy before surgery, we activated the T cells within the tumour that were previously functionally impaired, which is essentially what helped extend people's lives," Cloughesy said.
In a person with cancer, if antigen-specific T cells are present and impaired by the tumour and the surrounding microenvironment, they can be awakened by the drug prior to surgery.
In contrast, after surgery, the drug doesn't stimulate patients' T cells because those T cells are removed with the tumour.
The findings could be significant because there have been few major advances in the treatment of glioblastoma in the past two decades, and because it could be a step toward developing new biomarkers for the disease.
"This data may lead us to a better understanding of the mechanisms by which some patients generate significant immune responses to this therapy while others do not," said Prins, who is also a research member of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Center at UCLA. "It can also help us determine which combination of drugs could be most successful for each individual patient."
The team is now testing the immunotherapy in combination with vaccines and other checkpoint inhibitors.
"This isn't a very big study, and our data needs to be replicated, but we have a foot in the door," Cloughesy said. "We have found a way to use these checkpoint inhibitors in glioblastoma that we previously thought were ineffective. We now have a rational and logical way to develop immunotherapies going forward and a clinical development process for doing it."
Source: University of California - Los Angeles Health Sciences
We are an independent charity and are not backed by a large company or society. We raise every penny ourselves to improve the standards of cancer care through education. You can help us continue our work to address inequalities in cancer care by making a donation.
Any donation, however small, contributes directly towards the costs of creating and sharing free oncology education.
Together we can get better outcomes for patients by tackling global inequalities in access to the results of cancer research.
Thank you for your support.